Washington,DC Trip
I think that not only me but every Humphrey Fellow have same feelings that I do have .It was really exciting and more informative trip .(Global Leadership Forum),the people of 93 countries were gathered there and shared information about their countries cultures ,foods,living standards,political situation and the issues pervailing over there.I could not forget these days in my life.The panel discussions /sessions on different leadership skills and visit of Washington Post ,Voice of America . I was very excited that when Hillary Clinton came in the state department dinner hall and addressed welcome speech. Amazing time for learning and getting information about America creation.I loved a lot and I learnt a lot that I could never before.
Rally for Sanity

From the reviews, the main target the Rally for Sanity went after was partisan media. Video clips of Glen Beck and extremist talking heads on both sides of the aisle was the main butt of the jokes. Jon Stewart said about the 24-hour news machine, “This machine “did not cause our problems but its existence makes solving them that much harder…If we amplify everything, we hear nothing.” A review in the Daily Beast said, “Stewart’s outrage at the sensationalism and superficiality of cable is largely on target. But it is, as he said, a “funhouse mirror” held up to a nasty political system and a conflict-driven society.” Additional jokes were made at the sake of ABC, CBS, AP, New York Times and NPR, news outlets who banned their journalists from attending the rally.
The rally seemed to highlight for me a strange balance that the media is trying to pull off. While some outlets are going for extreme partisan views to attract audiences, others are stepping so carefully that they don’t criticize the sometimes obvious mistakes of politicians.
DC Rally for Sanity
Being today in Washington DC is a blessing for a journalist: the rally at noon between Capitol and the big Needle, organized by the top Comedy Central duo Stuart/Colbert, and covered by each and every TV station you can imagine. The audience around the world could see all that happened on the stage and hear the live reports.
But the feeling behind the scene is a special experience – the human contact and the energy created by thousands of people who gathered to send a unique message to politicians: to make sense.
I am happy that I had a chance to share the moment with all of them.
by Daria
When photos don’t tell the truth.
Photos are just another way of telling stories, and therefore, together with all other mediums is subject to the perspective and interpretation of the storyteller.
I believe it is totally unethical to remove elements from a photography by digitally manipulating it. Maybe a good way to determine how much a photo can be manipulated is to ask oneself, “Is this photo still telling the same story that the photographer intended?”

The June 2010 cover of the Economist
It probably all comes down to the editor’s preference. Just as text piece can be changed from what the original writer intended so can a photograph. Simply by cropping it differently a photo-editor can make the photo tell a totally different story.
The reason why so many people care about it is because you often see the original photo somewhere else but not the original text of an article that has been modified.
The National Press Photographers Association says, “As journalists we believe the guiding principle of our profession is accuracy; therefore, we believe it is wrong to alter the content of a photograph in any way that deceives the public.”
Click to see more on digital tampering.
Michel
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton address to Hubert Humphrey Fellows 2010/2011
Secreatary of State Hillary Clinton and Alan Goodman President and CEO of IIE
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton address Hubert Humphrey Fellows
Clinton: “We do expect great things when you return home” by Aleksandra Dukovska
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent a strong message to the two hundred and twenty Hubert Humphrey Fellows from over eighty different world countries at the reception in the US Department of State yesterday.
Secretary of State Clinton underlined that investment in the people’s education should create different opportunities for them when they return home.
“What we trying to do in the Obama Administration and here at the State Department we have to build mutual understanding and mutual respect. We need more links between people and government today and people will be in the government tomorrow”.
“Therefore, we do expect great things from you when you return home after this period here as a Humphrey Fellows”, Secretary of State Clinton said.
Speaking on the opportunities and the possible doors that the Hubert Humphrey Fellowship can open in the future for the Fellows, she pointed out the great importance of networking.
“There is Alumni network of four thousand Humphrey Fellows in 156 countries around the world and there is a build in opportunity to network experience”, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said to the Fellows.
According to the Secretary of State, “this is a challenging experience, but we all think you are up to the challenge and I think that if you can take advantage of this time, your experience will help you became even more ready to assume a leadership position in your own country and society”.
Many of the Humphrey Fellows achieved their goals after they returned in their countries. Some of those success stories Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shared with Humphrey Fellows of year 2010/2011.
“One of your colleagues here landed an exclusive interview with President Obama this June. Another one from the Fellows who studied law in the class of 2002, just became first female police commissioner in India and in August 2008, a Humphrey Fellow was appointed as Columbian Minister of Defense”.
Speaking on the Hubert Humphrey legacy, she said that “he took stands on issues, whether they were popular or not and it fought hard for them”.
She recall on him as an early leader who fought for the civil rights and as somebody who supported the creation of a Peace Corps and who really appreciated the legacy of service.
The Hubert Humphrey Fellowship is founded on service of Hubert Humphrey who was “one of the real inspirational leaders of the last century in the United States”, said State Secretary Clinton.
Exploring the US Constitution
The Diane Rehm Show, a news/entertainment program on National Public Radio, is doing a special series about the United States Constitution. The first installment was about the separation of powers between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of our government. The second installment was an in-depth look at the Bill of Rights: the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. You can listen to both of the radio shows online, and the first one already has a transcript posted for you to read. The second one was just broadcast this morning, so the transcript isn’t online yet – I’m sure it will be soon.
http://thedianerehmshow.org/topic/the-constitution-today
Understanding the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights is really fundamental to understanding the way that democracy works in this country, and the reasons that it has persisted to the present day despite many social/cultural transformations and political changes.
– Ivy Bohnlein
Terrorism& Responses
By Malik Siraj Akbar
It was interesting to see the defensive reaction of some Pakistani (read Muslim) journalists in response to Dr. Arie Kruglanski’s presentation on “terrorism and the response to terrorism” today at the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) Center. It is not the first time I have met people who endeavor to justify terrorism under one or the other pretext.
Some of the participants of the discussion assumed that the presentation was intended to single out Islam as the root cause of terrorism which was in fact not the case. No one singled Islam out as a reason for global terrorism. Terrorists surely have no religion and are the enemies of the humanity. But when educated Muslims overreact on the issues of terrorism, they give an impression that they have become the self-appointed spokesmen for the terrorists who use the name of Islam for terrorist purposes. Why do educated Muslims not publically disown these terrorists instead of repeating their narrative that provides a subterfuge for the gruesome use of violence against civilians?
According to the teachings of Islam, no (non-state actor) can wage an armed struggle. Only the Amir-ul-momineen (the leader of the believers — say the head of the government or the State) has the authority to initiate a war (Jihad) against a rival country. In case non-state actors start operating, it is seen in Islam as an act of sabotage (Baghawat/fitna) which is punishable with death penalty.
Like it or not, 90% of the terrorist threats today either emanate from the Islamic world or are connected with the Islamic ideology. Faisal Shahzad, who tried to detonate a bomb at the Time Squire, did not cite the reasons of global poverty or the world’s inability to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for this terrorists plot. He purely mentioned reasons affiliated to Islam for his act.
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, a prominent Islamic scholar who has authored more than 200 books, says: “Muslims are responsible for this state of affairs. After the advent of modern civilization, Muslims found themselves at the backseat, so they became furious. Everywhere in the world they waged a war in the name of jihad and when they failed in this self-styled jihad they started suicide bombing. It is this negative reaction by Muslims that is mainly responsible for the present crisis. The only solution to this problem is that Muslims must accept that what is happening against them is due to their own backwardness in education, modern science and in the modern concept of organization. So they must abandon all those negative activities and violent activism. They must stop all these things and go back to education. They must consolidate themselves in terms of modernity otherwise there is no future for the present Muslim generation.” (To read the full interview, please click here)
For people who link terrorism with the so-called ‘faulty” US foreign policy in the aftermath of 9/11, I wonder why thousands of Shia Muslims were killed by Sunni Muslims in Pakistan in 1990s when there was no issue of defective US foreign policy, 9/11 or Muslim reaction to the atrocities in Palestine. Likewise, who is to be blamed for the persecution of Hindus and Ahmedis in Pakistan when there was no issue with the US foreign policy in that region?
It is sickening to meet people who still deny the occurrence of 9/11.
I also found the description of “successful” Saudi model of de-radicalization very funny. I am not sure how much Saudi Arabia has succeeded in de-radicalizing its society but one thing is certain that it has ruined the foundations of the society in Pakistan by handsomely funding fundamentalist religious schools. As the leader of the Islamic world, Saudi Arabia should provide competent scientists and doctors to the Islamic world not enemies of humanity like Bin Laden.
We are in Washington DC
Wow, Washington DC, formally the District of Columbia is so wonderful and beautiful. It is my first time to come here. Lovely autumn…So many trees, so many colors and crowd of people/ international city/. I am wondering that am I in a forest or in the city?. So beautiful.
We are in the Marriott Hotel, located in Virginia state which is bordered with Washington DC by the Potomac river.The Washington Metropolitan Area, of which the District is a part, has a population of 5.4 million, the eighth-largest metropolitan area in the USA.
We visited the University of Maryland, College Park, which is a public research university, the flagship campus of the University System of Maryland, and the original 1862 land-grant institution in Maryland. It was wonderful to meet other HH Humphrey Fellows there. 
Arrival in DC/Arlington
By Malik Siraj Akbar
I woke up at 5:30 a.m today to catch US Airways flight# 44 for Washington DC. It had already started raining. I packed everything and made sure that I had not forgotten anything. I thought I hadn’t . but now, while writing this blog entry in my Arlington hotel room, I realize I forgot to pack my Humphrey T-shirt! Walter Cronkite School of Journalism had prepared special T-shirts for its Humphrey Fellows.
Mukesh, Chev, Javed and I were lucky to get the Discount Cab for $20 to the airport. Thus, it was a great deal and we had to pay $5 each.
Washington is unlike Phoenix: It is cold here. The wind blows fast enough to compel you to wear a jacket.
After settling into our rooms, the group of Humphrey fellows went out for the search of some food. We, three journalists from Pakistan, were perhaps very lucky to find a wonderful Arabic restaurant down the Key Bridge in Arlington to eat some Pakistani food. The chef there was a Bengali and the owner was an Arab.
It was the best meal I had gormandized since coming to the United States in the last three months. We had to pay $50 for the meal but we did not have an iota of regret over spending the money. After all, you cannot get good food even at times when you have a pocketful of money.
Political Views: I’m a Journalist
All the talk about ethics on Monday really got me thinking. I can’t go around touting my own opinions while simultaneously calling myself a journalist. It really is unfair to my readership (though small and almost non-existent) for me to be an advocate for any political party. This idea is what motivated me to change my status on Facebook. Instead of having a political party listed in my “Political Views” section, I changed the text to read “I’m a Journalist.”
This was difficult for me because I am normally a very opinionated person. I very outspoken in terms of my view on policy and certain arguments. The problem is that I have to hide some of these opinions if I plan on doing my job correctly.
I don’t think these undertones influence my writing. After all, everyone has an opinion about something. So it’s pretty naive to think that journalists are completely objective about everything they cover. What I learned was the difference between having an opinion and advertising an opinion. Changing the status of my Facebook info page didn’t change my political views. But it did change how I advertise those views.
In the end, I think its about distancing your work from your opinions. I fully believe that I can write a balanced story that flies against my personal opinions. It probably helps. By being conscious of our own leanings and biases, we can make sure to account for them in stories or to remove ourselves from them altogether. But our audience doesn’t need to know about that internal decision making. Our first duty is to report.
-Sebastien Bauge
LEADERS OF THE WORLD: VLADIMIR PUTIN
A Family Man
He lived a simple childhood, born on October 7th, 1952, in Leningrad. He grew up to have a model marriage and a picture perfect family. However, some allege that his father was a Nazi, that his true mother gave him up after a birth out of wedlock, and that he maintained a relationship with a mistress. All this aside, the indisputable fact is that Putin is a sportsman unlike any other, keeping the media focused on his constant outings to fish, hunt, and demolish his competition in Judo tournaments. Anyway, talking about his past irritates him. He obviously prefers to make his own picture of his way to the role of a world ruler, and have it published for example on his Official Website. Consequently, regardless of whether he has a perfect family or not, he advertises his “perfect life” of a man that is “successful in life”. The image makes many people trust that he can save or make better their own life.
Before Politics
In 1975 Vladimir Putin joined the KGB, shortly after graduating from the KGB school in Leningrad. He worked in counter-intelligence nearly a year later. One of his many assignments included working undercover, often as a police officer, keeping surveillance on foreigners and diplomats in Leningrad. The work as a KGB agent certainly made him learn more about his country, but also about the history and strategic dynamics of the world’s politics which gave him the necessary background for a leader of a big country full of challenges. He had many chances to observe what makes a good image of a high-ranked politician, and that sometimes the appealing face makes stronger impact to the masses than the strong-handed politics. So he built up both at the same time.
Political Life
In May of 1990 Putin became Advisor to the Mayor of St. Petersburg. Eight years later he became the deputy chief of the presidential staff. Between August of 1999 and May of 2000 Putin was the Deputy Prime Minister, and Prime Minister. Most importantly, after Boris Yeltsin’s surprise resignation, Putin became acting president in December of 1999 until he was elected president in May of 2000. After his terms Putin, as of 2008, is now the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. Able to market himself as an omnipotent leader, Putin remains in a high-ranking position in the Russian Federation.
The Role of a Leader
A big nation with a long tradition of ruthless rulers from tsars to communist revolutionaries puts many challenges in front of a modern leader. And Vladimir Putin has never shown a slightest sign of weakness. During his time of control he dealt with Russian affairs with an iron fist, and helped the economy grow – though not without issues. Under Putin’s command, Russia expanded its “Kremlin control” and kept control over political activity in the public. Even media was under a close watch, as they were given blacklists of people and topics that could not be incorporated into their coverage. Russia used it’s resources as a strategic measure in it’s foreign affairs, and during the war with Georgia. During Putin’s time in office the Russian economy has seen a high and stable growth in GDP and significant drop in unemployment and foreign debt, all the while increasing the standard of living for Russians. Though, inflation and corruption still remain as challenges of the Russian Government and economy. Although there are some other facts supporting him to obtain these results, such as rising oil and commodity prices in the world as well as the strong precautions taken after the financial crisis of 1998, it can be concluded that Putin used the circumstances of the time quite effectively to improve his leadership potentials.
Putin-Mania
The unforgettable piece of the Putin puzzle is that he has stricken Russia, and the world, with a kind of Putin-mania. Fly fishing, shooting, flying jets, practicing martial arts, and being inducted into the Hell’s Angels, Putin has become a pop-culture icon. Able to command a room, a government, and keep a person that has made him a celebrity, Putin is able to control anything at his hands through intelligent manipulation and old communist tactics while using the media to his advantage.
Conclusion
Being a leader is about affecting people. A leader needs a strong background in his area. Moreover a good leader should be successful in his area and be wise enough to use the circumstances of the time effectively on a bigger scale. However, not all the successful and wise people with a strong background can be leaders. In the case of Vladimir Putin we can see that a strong charisma supported by a strong hand ruling can be crucial to stay on the top for a long time.
by Daria Marjavonic, Youef Hawash, Xiao Yang and Sevgi Serpil Atalay
Happy 1st Amendment Week!
The First Amendment, added to the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution in 1791, is one of the most precious legacies of the American democratic tradition of human rights. It says:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The National Freedom of Speech Week has started at the ASU in the very First Amendment Forum with three of us Humphrey Fellows: Khanda from Mongolia, Affridi from Pakistan, and me Daria from Croatia.
The moderator Dr. Joseph Russomano had a noble idea to make us share our experiences on the subject, as journalists and citizens of our respective countries. I sincerely hope that we managed to justify the invitation to be a part of the Must-See-Monday not like an event that students just must attend, but the one they really don’t want to miss.
Everybody can find out from different media that it is not easy to be a journalist in Pakistan these days, that Mongolia is going through major changes from hard communism to democracy, that Croatian journalists have gone through “the last European war” and now face economic challenges. But it is always different to have a one-on-one conversation with people who are living it.
We navigated the rough sea of history, political changes and professional challenges the best we could. If you wish, you can see the result on ASU web pages.
by Daria
Did Multiculturalism fail in EU?
by Aleksandra Dukovska
Integration of Muslim community in the society is not only the issue of the USA and Barack Obama’s administration.
Some of the European Union member countries have the same issue to deal with it. A recent poll shows that unreasonable fear from Muslim population on European ground is not only the myth.
In light of Angela Merkel’s statement that multiculturalism in Germany has “utterly failed,” interesting to note that in a recent poll, 58% of Germans believe Muslims should face restrictions in practicing their religion and 55% says Arabs are “unpleasant people, CNN reporter and anchor Hala Gorani wrote on her FB page.
“The debate over foreigners in Germany has shifted since former central banker Thilo Sarrazin published a book accusing Muslim immigrants of lowering the intelligence of German Society”, Sarah Marsh wrote in the article “Merkel says German multiculturalism has failed”.
Merkel has tried to speak both on integration and that Germans must accept that mosques have become part of their landscape. What is the possible reason for giving the statement of multiculturalism fail?
The idea of multiculturalism especially in the European Union countries that still define the nation as nationality could be deeply discordant.
The interesting aspect of German chancellor statement of failure of multiculturalism is that she chosen to become “the most aggressive major European leader to speak out against multiculturalism”, commented STRATFOR in their analysis on Germany and the failure of Multiculturalism.
According to STRATFOR anlysis, “all of Europe, indeed, much of the world, is coping with the struggle between cultures within their borders”.
Another example of this struggule we can saw in other European Union member countries.
In Britain, they are facing the same opposition to the Muslim population from individuals or far-right groups.
In the Observer article, Mark Townsend described The English Defense League as a far-right group who wants to combat the “Islamification” of British cities.
According to Townsend, EDL “has made contact with anti-jihad groups within the Tea Party organization and has invited a senior US rabbi and Tea Party activist to London this month.
“The league has also developed links with Pamela Geller, who was influential in the protests against plans to build an Islamic cultural centre near Ground Zero”, wrote Townsend in the Observer.
United Kingdom home secretary Theresa May recently banded marches of EDL in the city of Leicester, which has a significant Muslim population.
Last month at the Foreign Office reception to mark the Muslim festival of Eid, May send this message: “I think it’s important that we, as a new Government, start treating the Muslim community as a mature and fundamental part of our society, and stop talking to Muslims only about counter-terrorism”.
May said the review of the Government’s counter-terrorism strategy aimed “to achieve a better balance between public safety and civil liberties, something the last government got badly wrong”.
Do you think that European politicians will succeed to find the right answer for the integration of Muslim population in their countries? In fact, did multiculturalism fail in EU?
Ethics in Journalism
For sure obeying to ethical rules is very important in any profession. However when it comes to journalism, it is especially quite a tough job to obey these rules. You have to be careful with your relations, however you have to have some relations to be able to get some news too. Moreover, as you dont know what you may have to report in the future, it is almost impossible for you to be careful with all your relationships. It seems that you have to have very distant relationships with your environment to be able to be a true journalist.
Do you know any journalist who covered an important issue about one of their relatives? Do you know any journalists who continued to write at his column even after he strictly criticize his editor in his column? Personally I don’t know, but if you know such journalists please share with us.
Serpil Atalay
The Myth of Objectivity
The class seemed clearly divided today about the ethical aspects of coverage of terrorist activities. I believe as journalists, our job is to present the truth as it is. Therefore, we should not become the self-appointed mitigation authority. While editing or cropping pictures from crime scene, we only end up as collaborators with the terrorists. A cropped picture may not undo a catastrophe that strikes. Such behavior, on the contrary, demonstrated under the pretext of ‘responsible journalism’ is actually an effort to tell the readers, listeners or viewers that nothing actually happened. In my views, hiding the real pictures is complete professional dishonesty.
Until we report the truth, how are the citizens going to stand against war, terrorism and human rights violation?
Las Vegas Trip.
My Las Vegas trip was the best experience of the life .I think that Las Vegas city is perferable to visit once a life not more for every person of the World as Vegas impect is given to .This is full of sins where no hiderrnce and no law bound except pracituation that is banned .Thank God that at least one sin is banned over there .This is the city of sins.People were gambling ,walking clubs of every type .The beautiful buildings of course impresses ,too .well these are in all over the America.I liked one thing very much that is lighting decorated symbols fo different status build over there.The bad thing I found that food was very expensive while drinks were cheaper then Phoenix .Amazing …..crazy and gambling city.
Presentation on Putin :
There was a Presentation on Putin ,The Presently Prime Minister of Russia and former President ,was held by some of the Humphrey colleagues on last Monday .It was quiet informative and good enough but very lack of the declaring his leadership qualities .I could not find these in entire presentation .The Group had worked hard a lot and their body language was pretty good and explanation power excelent but it was much lenthy that it was just compelling the people draging the hair or making the seats empty .I think that the Group should have to highlight the leadership qualities that how Putin became the leader , entered in the politicis and why he was elected President twice by the people .this was not just the reason that he took bold steps to strenthen the economy of the Russia .As we presented the leadership qualities of Adolf Hitler being in so power ,he was stupid one and he could not spare that .
Financial and Organizational Sustainability are important for the Non-profit Section
I attended the 18th Annual Nonprofit Conference on Sustainability Strategies in Phoenix. This year’s theme, “From Red to Black: Innovative Thinking for Generating Income and Resources”. This conference included workshops on board leadership, strategic planning, program/organizational evaluation, marketing/PR, social media, volunteer management, financial management and social enterprise and innovation. Workshop facilitators was presenting specific examples demonstrating innovative thinking and creativity towards the organization’s sustainability.
I was very excited to listen the presentation of Kay Sprinkel Grace, Clara Miller, and Steven G. Seleznow as our Conference Keynote speakers. They are really very good. I really learned new things related to Organizational and Institutional Sustainability.
I will write more about this conference later.
Alauddin










































Recent Comments